Quoting Rathje Woodward’s briefing, the Court of Appeals explained “The clear, plain, and unambiguous language of section 8 of the Act required the Department to provide YAC with written notice of its intent to recover the grant funds, and the Department was required to forward this written notice to YAC’s current business address. The Department failed to do this and therefore failed to fulfill the statute’s notice mandate.”
After a three-day bench trial in February 2025, Rathje Woodward secured a complete defense judgment in favor of its client, Kathleen Zellner. In that case, Suisse Bancorp, Inc. v. Zellner, et al., Suisse Bancorp sought more than $20 million allegedly due on loans extended to Zellner in 2007 and 2009. Zellner contended that she had […]
On April 8, the Connecticut Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in favor of Rathje Woodward clients Commonwealth Legal Group and Commonwealth Client Services. The Connecticut Supreme Court accepted Rathje’s argument that the Department of Banking lacked the authority to regulate the practice of law in Connecticut and preserved Commonwealth’s right to judicially challenge the […]
On October 18, 2023, Rathje Woodward filed an amicus brief in the Seventh Circuit on behalf of law school professors Caprice Roberts and Doug Rendleman in Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of the Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Energy. In that case, the trial court found in favor of the Band on its […]
Rathje Woodward LLC obtained a defense verdict for a higher education institution on claims for discrimination and retaliation in a bench trial before the Circuit Court of DuPage County.
CONTRACTS AND LEASES IN THE WAKE OF COVID-19.